This site's only real asset is that its numbers can be checked. That
is worth nothing unless the errors are published too. Every mistake found here is logged
below — what we said, what was wrong with it, and what it should have said — including
the ones no reader had noticed.
6 August 2026Material
We said no ABA platform publishes its pricing. Several do.
We published "Not one of the twelve platforms in this guide publishes
its pricing. Every single one is quote-only."
It should have said that most do not. Several publish per-seat rates on
their own websites — Office Puzzle, for one, lists $19.99 per user per month.
What went wrong. The claim was almost certainly true when written and was
never re-checked. Pricing transparency is exactly the kind of fact that changes
without anyone announcing it, and an absolute — "not one", "every single one" — is
the most fragile sentence you can write about a market. It was found while building
a replacement comparison page, not by a reader.
Also. Several tool listings still carry a machine-readable flag saying the
vendor does not publish pricing. Those are being re-checked one vendor at a time
against each vendor's own site, and we are not flipping any of them on inference.
6 August 2026Editorial
Two vendor listings cited review sentiment. Both are gone.
Our CentralReach listing carried "Learning curve is the most commonly cited
drawback in public reviews," and our Rethink listing carried "Newer entrants
frequently position against its interface."
Both are unverifiable claims about named, identifiable businesses sourced to
aggregate sentiment rather than to anything checkable — which is precisely what our
own comparison rule forbids. They were written before that rule existed and were not
caught when it was added.
They have been replaced with facts from each vendor's own published documents.
The CentralReach listing now records its published contract term, notice window and
price-adjustment policy, which is both safer and more useful to a buyer than a
sentiment summary ever was.
5 August 2026Material
Our correction to Florida's rate was itself wrong
We published $12.19 per 15 minutes for CPT 97153 — the figure we moved to
on 2 August when fixing the error described below.
It should have said $12.26 per 15 minutes, $49.04 an hour.
What went wrong. The same failure as the original, one code over. $12.19 is
what Florida pays for 97152, 0362T and 0373T — three other codes on the same page. In
correcting a code mix-up we introduced a second code mix-up, and then rejected the
right answer: a research pass had proposed $12.26 and we ruled it out, believing it
belonged to a different year. It did not. Florida prints $12.26 on both the 2025 and
the 2026 schedule.
Why it took three days. Because we never reopened the PDF. The 2 August fix
was made by reasoning about which figure belonged to which code rather than by reading
the document again — the exact substitution this site's first rule exists to forbid.
The error was found only when we returned to restore the withdrawn rows.
Also. The correction below states that $15.37 is Florida's rate for 97156.
That is wrong too. $15.37 is 97155 with modifier HN, the assistant-analyst rate for
protocol modification; 97156 with modifier HN is $15.24. The original error was real
and the size of it was right — the code we blamed it on was not.
What changed as a result. Florida's page now carries all 23 rows from the
2026 schedule, including the 97155 and 97156 rows withdrawn in July, each read twice
from the source PDF by two different extraction methods. We also compared the 2025 and
2026 schedules line by line and confirmed Florida changed no ABA rate between them.
2 August 2026Material
Florida's Medicaid rate was overstated by 26%
We published $15.37 per 15 minutes for CPT 97153, Florida's core
direct-therapy code, or $61.48 an hour.
It should have said $12.26 per 15 minutes, $49.04 an hour. At the time we
published $12.19, which was also wrong — see the entry above, dated 5 August.
What went wrong. A code mix-up. $15.37 is Florida's rate for 97155 with
modifier HN, protocol modification by an assistant behavior analyst — a different
service delivered by a different practitioner. The figure was read from the correct
schedule but attached to the wrong code. It was live for roughly two weeks, on the
state holding a quarter of the country's ABA organizations, in the dataset this site's
credibility rests on. It was caught by re-reading the source rather than by any reader.
Also. Florida's 97155 and 97156 rows were withdrawn at the same time pending
a re-read, rather than corrected on a guess. They were restored on 5 August.
2 August 2026Material
Indiana's rates had been superseded for three months
We published $17.06 per 15 minutes for 97153, transcribed correctly from
IHCP bulletin BT2023169.
It should have said $16.04. Indiana cut all non-group ABA rates by 6%
effective 1 April 2026 under bulletin BT202627 — three months before our own page
claimed it had been checked.
What went wrong. We verified the figure against the document we cited and
never asked whether that document was still current. Codes 0362T and 0373T were also
in the cited bulletin but missing from our table with nothing explaining the absence,
so the page implied Indiana does not pay them.
2 August 2026Withdrawn
TRICARE's rates were removed rather than corrected
We published hourly ranges for TRICARE across 97151/97156 and 97153/97155.
We now publish no figure at all. The rate file sits behind a JavaScript
gate; three separate reads of the page disagreed with one another; and one suggested
our ranges had 97155's and 97156's numbers attached to the wrong codes — the same
failure as Florida. A newer schedule effective 1 May 2026 also supersedes the one we
cited. The page now links the official document and states no rate.
A missing figure is recoverable. A wrong one is not.
2 August 2026Material
Nine citations pointed at documents containing no ABA rates
A citation that goes nowhere useful is a broken promise, and nine of ours were.
- Arizona cited the Behavioral Health Outpatient schedule, which contains
only H, S and T codes and no ABA CPT codes whatsoever.
- Texas cited the Outpatient Behavioral Health schedule. The ABA codes are
on a different schedule entirely, Autism Services.
- Georgia cited the January 2018 ASD policy manual, which prices ABA
against Category III codes the AMA deleted at the end of 2018.
- Maryland's own fee schedule link returns a 404; the live schedule is
inside a provider manual.
- Ohio cited a package stamped "DRAFT — NOT FOR FILING" with proposed
figures and a blank effective-date column.
- West Virginia's policy link returns a 404.
- Nevada and Washington cited billing guides that list every ABA
code and no dollar amount anywhere.
- Michigan's cited document refuses all non-browser requests.
All nine now cite documents that contain the figures.
2 August 2026Clarified
The BCBA count needed its scope explained
We published 75,574 certified BCBAs. The BACB's own headline figure is
85,587, so anyone checking would have concluded our number was wrong.
It was not wrong, but it was unexplained. 85,587 is worldwide; 75,574 is the
50 states and DC. Roughly ten thousand BCBAs are certified outside the United States.
Both source notes now say this outright.
2 August 2026Material
The company directory listed one percent of the companies
We published 234 companies, those with three or more registered locations.
The registry holds 17,781. Every single-site company was invisible, which
meant a reader searching for a real company they knew existed would conclude it was
not registered. Two were reported to us by name.
What changed. Every registered organization is now listed, across state and
city pages, and searchable. Street addresses are still withheld for companies with
fewer than three locations, because those may be home addresses — that protection was
the reason for the threshold and it has been kept, while the exclusion has gone.
2 August 2026Names
Companies were listed under names nobody uses
We published federal legal business names. ABAECARE LLC is known as Catalyst
Behavior Solutions; SOAR HEALTH, INC. as Soar Autism Center; PANTOGRAN LLC is the
Center for Autism and Related Disorders.
What changed. Twenty-four companies now lead with the trading name, each
confirmed against the company's own site rather than a directory. Five separate legal
entities turned out to be one company, HealthPRO Pediatrics, and were merged into one
page; CARD was split across two registrations and was merged too.
What did not change. Thirteen companies where the registry's alternative
name is a program brand rather than a trading name, or where two different companies
share a name, were left alone. Asserting a name we could not confirm would be worse
than an unfamiliar one.
2 August 2026Editorial
Two page titles were wrong, and the writing was not American
The reimbursement dataset's title said "The Data Index" rather than "The ABA
Index". The statistics page was titled simply "Statistics". British spellings —
organisation, programme, practise, catalogued — had spread through the company pages
and the statistics page on a site written for a US audience.
All fixed, and a build gate now fails on British spellings outside quoted names
and cited document titles.
1 August 2026Material
A company history section failed its own audit
An audit of 141 claims across the company pages found fewer than half were
supported by the source cited for them, and ten were contradicted by their own
citation. Among them:
- Motivity's headquarters was cited to a page that states no location anywhere.
- The NPAWorks page said a chief executive "was quoted without being named". The
cited release names and quotes her.
- Passage Health's founding year was wrong by one year, and its funding total
double-counted a note that later converted.
- CentralReach's acquisition price was labeled gross when the filing says net of
cash acquired; its headquarters city was stale.
- Artemis ABA described someone as a co-founder when the company's About page says
he joined after founding.
The section was held back from publication until every claim was re-verified
against its source. Verification before publication is now the standing rule.
1 August 2026Editorial
We drew conclusions the documents did not support
Company pages carried lines such as "private-equity owners generally sell within a
few years, and the next owner sets the roadmap and the renewal price". That is
assumption presented as analysis — unsourced, unfalsifiable, and unfair to companies
that had done nothing to earn the implication.
Removed. The rule now is to state what the filings say and let the reader draw the
conclusion.