Hi Rasmus Alternatives: What to Compare Before You Decide

Hi Rasmus draws more brand searches than almost any platform in this category, and the people searching for alternatives are usually asking one of two questions. Either: we love the clinical model — can anything match the supervision and caregiver workflows? Or: we’re a US practice and we need the billing side to be as strong as the clinical side. Those are different evaluations with different shortlists, so this page is organized around them rather than around a padded list of twelve names.

The baseline first, from the vendor’s own documentation (reviewed July 2026): Hi Rasmus’s documented core is clinical data collection, supervision workflows, telehealth, a built-in curriculum library, a 40-hour RBT training program, staff competency profiles, clinical outcomes reporting, and caregiver collaboration — with adoption among telehealth-forward and internationally distributed teams. Two things are not in that documentation: native US payer billing, and a price (it publishes neither; as of 13 August 2026 it quotes through sales). Those two absences are, in practice, why most of these evaluations happen.

If you’re matching the clinical model

The platforms whose documented center of gravity is the clinical layer:

Motivity — flexible, data-first collection with practice management available; publishes rates ($24/learner/mo per module, $48 all-in-one). Raven Health — clinical data collection and practice workflows for small-to-mid teams; publishes rates ($29/learner/mo standalone, or an all-in-one priced at 5% of claims paid). SpectrumAi (Twyll) — venture-backed, focused on structured, payer-credible clinical data; pricing not published.

None of these documents Hi Rasmus’s specific caregiver-collaboration and supervision emphasis as centrally — that combination is genuinely its differentiator. If those workflows are why you’re here, the honest comparison is whether the alternative’s clinical flexibility plus its published price beats a quoted price for the workflows you’d actually use.

If you need the US billing layer

Practices whose constraint is insurance operations are usually comparing against all-in-ones where billing is the documented core:

AlohaABA — scheduling, billing and claims, authorization tracking with utilization monitoring, payroll, plus integrated data collection; publishes rates ($29.99/staff/mo + $12/client/mo data collection, 30-day free trial) — full alternatives page. Theralytics — practice management and data collection with published per-client or per-user rates (from $20/client/mo; $200 monthly minimum; a free six-month BCBA startup plan). Passage Health — newer all-in-one spanning intake, clinical data, and billing; pricing not published. Noteable — behavioral-health EHR with ABA data collection and billing; publishes rates ($300/mo including five users; RCM at 3.9% of collections). Portia — data collection and practice management at a published $30/client/mo, with billing services priced separately. The full suites — CentralReach and Rethink Behavioral Health, covered with their trade-offs in the practice-management guide and CentralReach alternatives.

How to run the evaluation

The four-part framework applies: data export first (get Hi Rasmus’s export format and make the candidate demo the import), contract terms second (the clause checklist — especially relevant when the incumbent quotes and several challengers publish), implementation reality third, and integration coverage fourth. For distributed and telehealth teams specifically, add a fifth: verify each candidate’s documented telehealth and remote-supervision workflows against your actual service model, because that’s the layer where Hi Rasmus set your expectations.

Vendor capabilities from each vendor’s own documentation as dated on the linked profiles (July–August 2026); pricing-publication status re-verified 13 August 2026. We take no vendor payment and correct on the record: [email protected].